Let's count the number of covers up on Marvel's site that show women as being both sexy and in peril, shall we? Because this and this have put me in the mood to do so.
>One.
>Two.
>I'm including this this partly because I've always found the preponderance of Superheroines with unbound long hair to be nearly as silly as the number of exposed bellies and improbable shoes. O don't know who she is, but even if she's not a superhero - the artist included that flowing long hair for a reason, and it's not just to improve the composition. That makes Three.
>Yes, she's evil, but she's a sexy evil villain - and we all know why that is. Four.
>So, the other two X-Women look like they're kicking ass, but Rogue looks like she'd looking for a handy boulder. Five.
>I so want to count this, because she looks like she's about to fall, but I'll let that one slide.
>I get that there's men lying (dead)?) on the ground as well as women, but only the women are draped as well as mangled. Six.
>Wolverine may be the one with the claws in his neck, but she's the one who looks scared - and has holes in costume everywhere a normal costume would have more coverage. Seven.
>Again, why do Superheroines so often look like they are scared? Eight.
>Again! Scared! Why are the girls always the ones who are scared! Nine.
>No, I'm not going to count this - but it does rather look like she's expecting something other than what she's obviously getting. That ought to be it's own category.
>Oh, hell yes. Ten.
>I swear, it's like we never left the Victorian age and women are constantly swooning gracefully. Eleven.
>Twelve
>Scared again. Possibly surprised this time. But note how the gals look scared surprised and the guys are angry surprised. Except for the Thing, who just looks comical. Thirteen.
>It still counts when it's women doing the violence. Fourteen.
>This is simply because of the composition, but I still think it counts. Fifteen.
>I wasn't going to coountthis, but then I noticed how her knees are together and decided that it doesn't really matter if that's just her regular suit - because who makes the suits so form fitting? And is it just me, or wouldn't one think that breast armor would cover both breasts together, not each individually? Sixteen.
>They're all rotting away, but they keep enough of her so that we get to see all that nice exposed skin. Seventeen.
>Eighteen
>Yay! They're all scared. But only she's half naked. Nineteen. (I somehow lost the link to this one - I'll go back and find it sometime soon.)
>Yeah, 'cause I'd totally have that expression if I just got punched in the face. Twenty.
>Not that these count for either, I just found the juxtaposition interesting.
>I do not get what this is about, but Twenty-One.
>Could her mouth be open any wider, and could they have worked harder to show her breast and hint at her crotch, and again with the unboundhair - while he has a helmet. Twenty-Two.
>Aside from Spider-Girl, are men just incapable of making that :0 face - and women incapable of making any other? Twenty-Three.
>Twenty-Four.
>You know, if the wouldn't keep insisting on making so many of the female characters the token girl, they'd worry less about making sure people are sure she's a girl, and then the women wouldn't look any more scared or prettied up than the men. Alas..... Twenty-Five.
>It's really scary that this is really good compared to the cover for the next issue. Twenty-Six.
>Twenty-Seven.
>Almost missed this one. Twenty-Eight.
>Twenty-Nine
One female shaped person, and we see more of her face then all of the guys she's chained up with combined. Thirty.
>Dear God. Thirty-One.
>Scott's doing the :0 face - but again with the sexy hair. When their flowing locks are practically their costume, it has the same effect as their actual form-fitting costumes. Thirty-Two.
>Thirty-Three
>Thirty-Four
>Is this her second or third so far? Thirty-Five.
>I was looking at whats-his-name, trying to decide if he counted or not, when I realized that it's her butt that's blocking part of our view of him. Thirty-Six.
>Now this doesn't count, but it gets a very special honorable mention because it's for kids, and while the boys and older girl all look scared, it's the girl we focus on first and last because of her placement, posture, and sight-lines. Bad Marvel.
>I have of course, saved the best for last. Thirty-Seven. And it's rated T+: 9 and up. (Though I've they've changed it to 12+ but not all of the site is updated.)
Now, let's count the number of covers up on Marvel's site that show men in peril and looking sexy, shall we?
>Ok, maybe - maybe - we can count this. But since the guy in the dominant position looks far sexier, I vote no.
>Aha! One thing you can always count on LKH for is the save the handsome prince plot. That's pretty much the reason she's one of my guilty pleasures. Too bad the comic sucks and Phillips looks more creepy than sexy. The thought was there, though. One.
>I can't decide about this because he's outnumbered, undressed, and not too scary muscled - but he's also not only got that bigass gun, but his symbolic genitals scream power! not pain! And well, gee, if this is Ghostrider - isn't that him up above as well, or is the guy with the bigass gun someone else? Either way - he doesn't really look scared, does he?
>I dunno, partly because I have a hard time finding something with eyes like that sexy but mostly because we don't have a but shot.
>Barely I'm not sure it should, because of the dominating images of strength behind him negate the small amount to which he's sexualized, but ok. Two.
>Call me weird, but I think this counts. Spiderman is so very, very small compared to the image behind him, and he's in one of those awkward pseudo-graceful positions. Three.
>I don't think that there's enough of his ass in this picture for it to count, but I'll do so anyway. Four.
>The way his legs are spread alone. Plus, he's got the :0 face. A very distorted :0 face, but a :0 face nonetheless. Five.
>Meh. He looks as confident rather than scared, but ok - just because his clothes are shredding. Six.
>Spidey's problem is that we're supposed to always remember it's Peter Parker in there. Which means he's vulnerable and human-shaped. Plus he's a spider, so his mere four appendages must try to do the work of the normal eight. I'll keep counting them, but I'm fairly certain the sexiness part is mostly unintentional. Whereas women are pretty much always drawn intentionally sexy. It's the combination of sex and peril that I think isn't always consious. Seven.
>Eight.
>Scott has the face, but he doesn't even have eyes.
>I really don't have a crush on Spiderman, I promise. I think my gudging might be skewed by the fact that it's so refreshing to see an actual male-shaped body after all those tanks. Nine.
>The intent is here but that weird mask thing is just not scary enough.
Note that we can't count this.
Damn. Now I have to go back and count the total covers. And the number that have women on them at all. And the number that don't have men at all. (I remember about three.) And the number of them that have women in peril that aren't sexed up.
Well, for now the final score is Thirty-Seven to Ten. With about half of the sexy men in peril consisting of nothing more than Spider-Man being a spider, and absolutely none of them comparing to the worst of the Thirty-Seven. (Anita Blake wants to, but it really doesn't manage it at all.)
It's too bad I know never want to buy anything from Marvel again, because I like this cover.
Plus this freakin' makes up for a good chunk of those other covers, 'cause Little Red - the perpetual warning to all girls to "stay on the path" or else - looks like she's more than capable of decking that big bad wolf with her basket.
Although, please don't tell me what this 'cause I'm sure I really don't want to know.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Blood is Cumpulsory, but it's Best if it's With "Love"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment